So, you want to know about me, huh? Has it come to this already?
Well… philosophically speaking, I am conservative when it comes to upholding agreements and professional law, and quite anarchist when it comes to despotic rules and hogwash.
If you and me were talking like over a garden fence with each other right now, and I would see a bewildered look on your face after my previous sentence, I would follow up by asking, if you ever heard of Gustav Radbruch. One of the things he talked about, was, in the gist of it in my words, that when there were them so-called “laws” by Nazis, and a case under such law entered a court of law, with the law/case running against basic principles of justice, that the judge should rule in favour of these principles.
In real life, this may have little to no relevance, when courts or judges aren’t even involved, as they get pushed aside by politics, or are ignored by the executive branch/es. In example, an U.S. citizen would likely have a good chance in an U.S. court, to argue that due to their citizenship, that they can’t be deported abroad, simply based on some claim of some agent, that the person is a foreigner. But when the case doesn’t even go before court, well, tough to even get to talk about what is just and unjust. And in the context of these things, I stand with common sense.
As for me more personally, I am fan of ideas, such as a state library, with a somewhat academically (and not politically) curated selection, such as Otto Braun’s memoires, and ongoing efforts, such as translation of historian Hagen Schulze’s work about Otto Braun “Preußens demokratische Sendung” (which would translate to “Prussia’s democratic broadcast”, referring to Otto Braun having had democratically held office as prime minister of Prussia, and that he was doing things, like radio broadcast, or as kids these days would more likely understand: “Otto Braun was like an OG-podcaster.”)